If you were involved in a CMS (or WCM - Web Content Management) purchase decision 5 years ago, you likely heard about the "open source" phenomenon. And, you probably cringed at the thought of supporting your revenue-producing, lead-generation website with low cost alternative to the Interwoven and Vignette giants. Cringe no more, open source solutions not only provide very similar features, the good ones are now fully supported as well.

Here's a recent article written by JT Smith on Website Magazine. (Choosing An Open Source Web Content Management System) He successfully details the differences between closed and open source systems (without bashing the Big Guys). Ultimately, every company has their own decision to make, their own contstraints, processes and budget concerns. A WCMS solution has to adhere to these points, so open source may not be for everyone. But it's certainly worth taking a look at some of JT's points:

As your business grows, your needs will change. The open source model provides a mechanism for adapting to that change without relying on proprietary software to catch up to evolving trends and new technologies.

Budget...Budget. If budget is a concern, and likely it is these days, open source makes sense. Period. Save the budget for your other interactive marketing strategies.

Fully supported. Lack of support used to be a pitfall of open source solutions. That has changed. You'll find that well established, reputable solutions offer not only support, but also a vast community of developers and end users.

Somewhere in between. Open source CMS does not necesitate custom application development. Nor does it necesitate costly professional services contracts. It really falls in the middle. The benefit of open source becomes the ability to lean in either direction.

I love JT's quote: "Using closed source CMS can be likened to buying a new car with the hood welded shut, the wheels permanently attached, and your only maintenance option is a visit to the dealership."

Give open source a look. At Definition 6, we utilize one of the "good ones", Umbraco. We've been through several (> 20), successful implementations for a variety of clients. Including websites in the travel, telecommunications and online retail industries. I'm proud to say that we're also the first certified solutions developer in North America.

Director of Software Development, Graham Street on the popularity of website integration with content management tools.

I've been noticing in recent months that the development projects crossing my desk for estimation have more and more in common. It's CMS, CMS and more CMS (Content Management Systems.)  Everyone feels entitled to have administrable content on their corporate website. CMS solutions have been around since the good old days of dial-up BBS systems. They've been steadily improving every day, from complicated systems that allow you to jump through 10 hoops to edit a sentence, to 1 hoop to edit a whole page. But this incremental improvement in CMS technology doesn't explain the spike of interest that I am speaking of.   

My father even asked me about a CMS topic on a recent trip home. This is the same Dad who showed me Lotus 1-2-3 on my first Compaq 286 in 1984. I still receive all tabular correspondence from him as a 1-2-3 attachment. So for him to be asking about easy self administration of web content for a non-profit, I was a little perplexed.. Excited and definitely proud, but also perplexed.

It's like activism for free speech at the corporate level. Only the cause for oppression is the "old system" that either allows very limited content administration, or perhaps offers too much flexibility with no boundaries, requiring that "editors" learn a syntactically obscure markup language specific to their respective system.  

As an employee of an online agency, with experience in website development and website integration, I hear things like "I want to update every page on my site, and I want to be able to do it just like I do here on my MySpace." It seems these users have learned how easy it "should be" to author some content and publish it to a web-page. I'm quite sure we can thank MySpace, FaceBook and Gmail for much of this. They've set a precedent for what is literally "even your parent could use it" usability standards.       

This new user group is a diverse group of people from all walks of life, from all generations,  who are ready to add content to their respective  enterprise's website. And where CMS systems do not already exist to support that in those organizations,  they're ready to spearhead an initiative to get it implemented,  because they know it can be done at a competitive cost,  almost as easily as creating a new my space page.

Definition 6 Client Manager, Andy McCann, recently presented an article to our group on how more and more companies are utilizing SharePoint as their next Enterprise 2.0 platform.

Recognizing Sharepoint's dominance in the Enterprise 2.0 space, many other Web 2.0 companies are now beginning to release and develop Sharepoint Web Parts and features that allow for easy integration into the Sharepoint environment. Not surprisingly, Microsoft's ability to build a huge Sharepoint user base is building a platform for partners to grow upon. This will allow for an even richer experience for Sharepoint users which in turn should help drive even larger adoption of Sharepoint which in turn should grow the number of available tie-ins to Sharepoint.

Andy pulled out three key points from his findings:

1. For many companies, SharePoint is the portal for all their business data - and not just docs, spreadsheets, presentations, and PDFs, but also browser-based forms that interact with built-in workflow technologies which add business logic to sophisticated online applications.
2. Microsoft and several partners announced new social networking, RSS feeds and other Web 2.0 technologies that allow integration with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 so users can integrate internal company data with outward-facing applications like external customer and partner communities. Awareness Inc., NewsGator Technologies Inc. and WorkLight Inc., for example, are all announcing updated versions of their Enterprise 2.0 tools integrated with SharePoint. Microsoft will also announce nine partners that have released or will release Enterprise 2.0 tools integrated with SharePoint.
3. Nine companies have recently launched Enterprise 2.0 offerings that integrate with SharePoint technology.  Here is an example of how NewsGator launched their SharePoint add-on



To read the article in its entirety, go to: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sharepoint_to_run_enterprise_2.php

Contact us today to find out how Definition 6 works with clients to build and deploy Microsoft’s SharePoint applications.

by Arondale Withers

Brief History of Personal Computing
The first breakthrough in personal computing was the invention of the computer mouse by Engelbart in 1964. The first computer to be marketed with a mouse was the Xerox 8010 Star Information System in 1981. The Apple Lisa is one of the first known computers to have used a mouse, but at $9995 US in 1983 ($21,482 in 2008 dollars), it can hardly be called a “personal” computer. Altair, IBM, Apple, Commadore (Amiga) and other IBM Clones all made advances in personal computing in the 80s and early 90s that brought computers to the masses, standard with mouse controllers. In 1985, Amiga was the first personal computer to ship their computers with a two-button mouse as standard.

A lot has changed in the world of personal computing. Today computer scientists are making some existing technologies more accessible in the market place and are changing the way in which we interact with computers. Gestures are quickly becoming the preferred and most logical method of quickly and efficiently navigating new interfaces and accomplishing tasks that are accomplished by mouse clicks today it’s a natural step toward Fitts Law.

A New Era of Multi-touch Gestures
Many companies have been working on multi-touch interfacing since the early 80s. In January 2005, Apple Computers applied for a patent titled Gestures for touch sensitive input devices (pictured right). In it you will see the pinching gestures used to zoom an object in and out. In that same year, Apple released a PowerBook with a trackpad that would accept a limited number of multi-touch gestures. One example is using two fingers being dragged vertically to scroll thru content. Another circular gesture with two fingers would page up/down content.

Multi-touch in the Marketplace
Over the past few years there have been many advances to bring multi-touch products to the marketplace. Most notably, the Apple iPhone and iPod Touch. Featuring single and multi-touch gestures, users can quickly and easily navigate thru songs, playlists, contacts, resize images, magnify text, access special menus and more.

Jeff Han of Perspective Pixel has one of the most advanced customizable multi-touch solutions to date. His solutions are currently reserved for private government applications and Fortune 500 corporations. Han’s 3x8 foot interactive wall starts around $300,000 with the ability for his 10-man team to customize the solution to your exact needs thru custom development and configuration.

Bill Baxton, one of the pioneers of multi-touch technology, is now working for Microsoft to further develop the Microsoft Surface tabletop computer. With Surface, you can put a wifi or blue tooth-enabled camera on the table top and its sensors will recognize the camera, extract the pictures from the camera and display them creatively on the screen to toss, resize, and more.  Its sensors are so advanced it can recognize a number of objects. If you set a glass on the MS Surface, it will animate creative imagery from the placed object. Set two phones on the MS Surface and you can trade contacts between phones... all wirelessly. Today’s applications include trade shows, car show rooms, luxury hotels, and homes. Pricing is between $5000-$10,000 US. As pricing falls, you will soon see an increase of these interactive coffee tables in homes and offices.

Replacing the Mouse
Replacing the mouse and changing the behavior in which we interact with computer interfaces may happen sooner than you think. Note: it took 20 years from the time the mouse was introduced by Engelbart in 1964 until the time the two-button mouse became standard in personal computing in 1985 with the Amiga 1000. It has been approximately 26 years since the conception of multi-touch technology. The transition of from mouse controllers to multi-touch interfaces has already begun and is becoming more affordable every year. Not only are we starting to see touch displays on the shelves of computer stores, but we are also see multi-touch interfaces in the audio production industry.

Mark my Words
In the next several years you will see an exponential growth in multi-touch technology. It will trickle down from government and corporate usage to many types of home applications; from personal computing to your microwave.

Multi-touch technology is changing the way we use computers and interact with devices. In 2007 the iPhone was introduced, selling millions of phones. The very next year A/V installers began offering iPhone solutions to their high-end clients to control their blinds, lights, HVAC systems, home theater and more with their phone. It is only the beginning. Soon, personal computing will be using multi-touch as the standard method of operation. Companies like N-trig, Jazzmutant, Perspective Pixel, Apple and Microsoft are working hard to be the first to change our digital lifestyle with products available at affordable prices.

Mouse be gone!

Even in a turbulent economy, when IT spending cuts are at a high, we understand that you still need developers to build and maintain basic business applications.  We also understand that you may have recently been forced to reduce internal headcount or use of local contractors.  Although utilizing offshore may be slower and a bit challenging at first you still need to maintain existing applications or build new ones that can create efficiencies.

How can Definition 6 help?
1. We can provide dedicated offshore software developers that work directly for  you in a staff augmentation format
2. We can also offer onshore team leads, project management and consulting on building a global sourcing program

What do we deliver?
1. Staff augmentation development resources to work under your guidance
2. Assistance and consulting on how to utilize offshore developers
3. Optional project management of your offshore teams

Contact us today for more information.

Frequently, in larger-scale Custom Application Development, a good architectural approach is to model the processes for the application using Business Process Modeling (BPEL). and Business Process Execution Lanaguage (BPEL).

BPEL actually stands for BPEL4WS (BPEL for Web Services)

Other Business Process technology includes:
Workflow&Rules Engines
* Business Rules can dictate flow of control
* Long running transactions - where completion can take days or weeks (think telephone company)

Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)
* Alerts and information for management dashboards
* Allows management by exception
* Frequently integrated with portals and BPM
* Still in the Early adoption stages

Collaboration Software
* Examples: Groupware Portals, Web 2.0 collaboration, B2B exchanges
MS Project (Enterprise) & PM Tools

There are also:
Process Driven Integration (PDI) Best Practices
* Make an organizational commitment to continuous process improvement
* It is a discipline and a journey, and the highest rewards require the highest investment.
* Measure Process Performance.
* Time / Cost, Profitability, Customer Satisfaction.
* Reward Process Improvement.
* Provide Real-time Dashboards
* Promote Reuse

Gary Braswell, a Definition 6 Senior Architect, reported on an article he recently read on Clint Boulton's Google Watch blog...

Users are trending from Facebook to Twitter and this opens up an opportunity for Google Services.

Gary focused on a few eye opening points from the article:

1. If users are trending towards Twitter from Facebook/MySpace, this is a bad omen for social advertising.
2. Upcoming solutions may be best served by taking advantage of Google's OpenSocial Services.
3. If a killer app could be built using the Google services, it could very well be stickier than any social networking site in existence today.

Gary's closing thoughts were that as an interactive media agency we need to keep tracking industry trends in social media because users are incredibly fickle in this area.  The application development community for Social Media and Social Networking technologies is in a state of perpetual innovation which must be tracked efficiently to maximize the business return.  The full article can be viewed at: http://googlewatch.eweek.com/content/social_networks/can_google_capitalize_on_facebooks_fade.html